A useful picture for this word: something turns up looking as if it belongs, and then cannot show where it came from. An argument arrives sounding well supported, and the support is not there. A smile arrives looking like sympathy, and no feeling is behind it. A line arrives on a scan looking like part of the body, and the machine made it. Each time the surface is convincing and the origin does not check out.

可以想成:一樣東西出現的時候看起來很像「本來就該在這裡」,可是一問它從哪裡來,就交代不出來。一個論點聽起來很有根據,實際上沒有根據。一個笑容看起來像同情,背後沒有那份感情。一條線出現在掃描影像上,其實是機器自己畫出來的。每一次都是:表面說得過去,來源說不過去。

From the word’s history

Wiktionary gives the word as a borrowing of Late Latin spurius, meaning illegitimate. That old sense is about a child who could not point to a recognised father, which is the same shape as the modern uses: the thing is present, but its origin will not stand up.

字典記載 spurious 借自晚期拉丁文 spurius,原意是「私生的」。那個舊意思講的是一個孩子指不出被承認的來歷。今天的用法還是同一個形狀:東西就在那裡,來源卻站不住。這條線索可以當記憶的掛鉤,不必當成每個現代用法的直接歷史來源。

Wiktionary, "spurious"

登入就可以看每一支怎麼連回核心畫面。