One long board, balanced on a point in the middle. It has two ends, and only two. Push one end down and the other end must come up; a moment later they have places. Nothing here climbs on its own, and nothing stays at the top. That shape sits behind every use of the word: two sides taking turns, over and over. First it is the real board in the park, and then it is prices, moods, scores and votes keeping the same rhythm.

可以想成一塊長板子,中間架在一個支點上。它只有兩端。一端壓下去,另一端就一定升上來。過一下子,兩端又換過來。這裡沒有東西會自己一路往上,也沒有東西停得住。seesaw 的各種用法,就像都從這個「兩邊輪流交換」的畫面長出來:先是公園裡真的那塊板子,接著是價格、心情、比分、票數這些看不見的東西,照同樣的節奏來回。所以英文用 seesaw 的時候,要找的不只是「有在變」,而是「變過去又變回來」。

From the word’s history

Our source says the word is probably an imitative, reduplicated form for rhythmic back-and-forth motion, in the same family as teeter-totter, zigzag and flip-flop, and that the verbs see and saw likely influenced its shape. If that is right, the sound of the word is already doing the rocking: see - saw, see - saw. It is a likely account, not a settled one.

來源說這個字很可能是模仿「來回擺動」的疊字詞,跟 teeter-totter、zigzag、flip-flop 屬於同一類;也可能受到 see 和 saw 這兩個動詞的形狀影響。如果這個說法成立,那這個字的聲音本身就在搖:see—saw、see—saw。來源用的是「可能」,所以這是一個有依據的推測,不是定論。

Wiktionary, "seesaw"

登入就可以看每一支怎麼連回核心畫面。