Deconstruction is the name of that way of reading and thinking. It says a piece of writing has no one true meaning we can finally pin down. Instead the text pulls in more than one direction, and the reader's job is to notice the tensions, the gaps, and the things the writing cannot quite control.

Deconstruction Deconstruction is the name of是名稱 that way of reading and thinking那種閱讀與思考方式的。It它 says主張 a piece of writing一篇文章 has no one true meaning沒有一個真正的意義 we can finally pin down我們最終可以確定下來的。Instead相反地, the text文本 pulls in more than one direction會朝不只一個方向拉扯, and而 the reader's job讀者的工作 is to notice就是去注意 the tensions張力, the gaps空隙, and以及 the things the writing cannot quite control寫作無法完全掌控的地方。

It began in philosophy and literary criticism and later turned up in talk about law, buildings, and culture.

It它 began in起源於 philosophy and literary criticism哲學和文學批評 and而 later後來 turned up in talk about也出現在...的討論裡 law, buildings, and culture談論法律、建築和文化的。

Though actually, in magazines and everyday talk, 'deconstruction' is also used as a fancy word for taking something apart — a recipe, a fashion look, an argument.

Though actually不過其實, in magazines and everyday talk在雜誌和日常談話裡, 'deconstruction'「deconstruction」 is also used as a fancy word也被當成一個花俏的字 for taking something apart用來指把某樣東西拆開 — a recipe一道食譜, a fashion look一套穿搭風格, an argument一個論點。

Teachers and critics mean the method, and they mean the claim that there is no single explanation. If you meet the word in a literature class, they almost certainly mean that method, not 'we pulled the dish to pieces on a plate.'

Teachers and critics老師和評論家 mean指的是 the method這種方法, and也指 they mean the claim「沒有單一解釋」這個主張 that there is no single explanation。If you meet the word如果你在...遇到這個字 in a literature class文學課上, they almost certainly mean他們幾乎肯定指的是 that method這種方法, not不是 'we pulled the dish to pieces on a plate.'「我們把那道菜拆散在盤子上」。